| Geant4 Cross Reference |
1 1
2 Examples for event biasing: B01 << 2 Examples for event biasing: B01 and B02
3 ------------------------------- << 3 ---------------------------------------
4 4
5 B01, B02 and B03 applications demonstrate the << 5 B01 and B02 applications demonstrate the usage of different variance
6 reduction techniques supported in Geant4, or p 6 reduction techniques supported in Geant4, or possible from the user
7 applications. 7 applications.
8 8
9 General remark to variance reduction 9 General remark to variance reduction
10 ------------------------------------ 10 ------------------------------------
11 The tools provided for importance sampling (or 11 The tools provided for importance sampling (or geometrical splitting and
12 Russian roulette) and for the weight window te 12 Russian roulette) and for the weight window technique require the user to
13 have a good understanding of the physics in th 13 have a good understanding of the physics in the problem. This is because
14 the user has to decide which particle types ha 14 the user has to decide which particle types have to be biased, define the
15 cells (physical volumes, replicas) and assign 15 cells (physical volumes, replicas) and assign importances or weight
16 windows to that cells. If this is not done pro 16 windows to that cells. If this is not done properly it can not be
17 expected that the results describe a real expe 17 expected that the results describe a real experiment. The examples given
18 here only demonstrate how to use the tools tec 18 here only demonstrate how to use the tools technically. They don't intend
19 to produce physical correct results. 19 to produce physical correct results.
20 20
21 General remark to scoring 21 General remark to scoring
22 ------------------------- 22 -------------------------
23 Scoring is carried out using the built-in Mult << 23 A interface G4VScorer is provided for the user. The user may create his
24 parallel geometries this requires a special sc << 24 own class to perform the desired scoring. The user defined class
25 See examples/extended/runAndEvent (especailly << 25 therefore should inherit from the interface G4VScorer.
>> 26 An example of an implementation of a scorer is G4Scorer
>> 27 which may be found in source/event.
>> 28 The scoring in these examples is done with a G4Scorer.
>> 29 The variance reduction techniques and scoring do not support all options
>> 30 of the Geant4 geometry. It only supports physical volumes and simple
>> 31 replicas.
>> 32 To identify a physical volume (or replica) objects of the class
>> 33 G4GeometryCell are used. Scoring is done according to these
>> 34 cells and importance values or the weight windows may be assigned to
>> 35 them.
>> 36 When scoring is done in a parallel geometry special action has to be taken
>> 37 to prevent counting of "collisions" with boundaries of the mass geometry
>> 38 as interactions. This is differently handled when scoring is done in the
>> 39 mass geometry.
26 40
27 Known problems - should not happen << 41 --> G4GeometryCell of the parallel geometry must not share boundaries with
28 ---------------------------------- << 42 the world volume! <--
>> 43
>> 44 Known problems
>> 45 --------------
29 In the following scenario it can happen that a 46 In the following scenario it can happen that a particle is not
30 biased and it's weight is therefore not change 47 biased and it's weight is therefore not changed even if it crosses
31 a boundary where biasing should happen. 48 a boundary where biasing should happen.
32 Importance and weight window sampling create p 49 Importance and weight window sampling create particles on boundaries
33 between volumes. If the GPIL method of a physi 50 between volumes. If the GPIL method of a physical process returns
34 0 as step length for a particle on a boundary 51 0 as step length for a particle on a boundary and if the PostStepDoIt of
35 that process changes the direction of the part 52 that process changes the direction of the particle to go back in the
36 former volume the biasing won't be invoked. 53 former volume the biasing won't be invoked.
37 This will produce particles with weights that 54 This will produce particles with weights that do not correspondent to the
38 importance of the current volumes. 55 importance of the current volumes.
39 56
40 Further information: 57 Further information:
41 -------------------- 58 --------------------
42 Short description of importance sampling and s 59 Short description of importance sampling and scoring:
43 https://geant4.web.cern.ch/collaboration/worki << 60 http://cern.ch/geant4/working_groups/geometry/biasing/Sampling.html
44 61
45 Example B01 62 Example B01
46 =========== 63 ===========
47 64
48 The example uses importance sampling or the we 65 The example uses importance sampling or the weight window technique
49 according to an input parameter. It uses scori 66 according to an input parameter. It uses scoring in both cases.
50 Importance values or weight windows are define 67 Importance values or weight windows are defined according to the mass
51 geometry. In this example the weight window te 68 geometry. In this example the weight window technique is configured such
52 that it behaves equivalent to importance sampl 69 that it behaves equivalent to importance sampling: The window is actually
53 not a window but simply the inverse of the imp 70 not a window but simply the inverse of the importance value and only
54 one energy region is used that covers all ener 71 one energy region is used that covers all energies in the problem.
55 The user may change the weight window configur 72 The user may change the weight window configuration by changing the
56 initialization of the weight window algorithm 73 initialization of the weight window algorithm in example,cc.
57 Different energy bounds for the weight window 74 Different energy bounds for the weight window technique may be specified
58 in B01DetectorConstruction. 75 in B01DetectorConstruction.
59 76
60 The executable takes one optional argument: 0 77 The executable takes one optional argument: 0 or 1. Without argument or
61 with argument: 0, the importance sampling is a 78 with argument: 0, the importance sampling is applied with argument: 1,
62 the weight window technique is applied. 79 the weight window technique is applied.
63 80
64 A modular approach is applied to the physicsli <<
65 81
66 Example B02 82 Example B02
67 =========== 83 ===========
68 84
69 This example uses a parallel geometry to defin 85 This example uses a parallel geometry to define G4GeometryCell objects
70 for scoring and importance sampling. The outpu << 86 for scoring and importance sampling. In addition it customizes
71 << 87 the scoring. In this example one scorer creates a histogram.
72 A modular approach is applied to the physicsli <<
73 The parallel geometry is included in this exte <<
74 <<
75 Example B03 <<
76 =========== <<
77 <<
78 This example uses a parallel geometry to defin <<
79 for scoring and importance sampling. The outpu <<
80 equivalent to B02 (and B01). <<
81 <<
82 This demonstrates a customised "flat" physics <<
83 of biasing. Complementary approach to the modu <<
84 <<
85 <<
86 _____________________________________________ <<
87 <<
88 <<
89 Generic biasing examples GB0 <<
90 ---------------------------- <<
91 <<
92 These examples illustrate the usage of a biasi <<
93 version Geant4 10.0. <<
94 The scheme is meant to be extensible, not limi <<
95 <<
96 Example GB01: <<
97 ============= <<
98 <<
99 This example illustrates how to bias process c <<
100 <<
101 <<
102 Example GB02: <<
103 ============= <<
104 <<
105 Illustrates a force collision scheme similar t <<
106 <<
107 <<
108 Example GB03: <<
109 ============= <<
110 <<
111 Illustrates geometry based biasing. <<
112 <<
113 <<
114 Example GB04: <<
115 ============= <<
116 <<
117 Illustrates a bremsstrahlung splitting. <<
118 <<
119 <<
120 Example GB05: <<
121 ============= <<
122 <<
123 Illustrates a "splitting by cross-section" tec <<
124 technique using absorption cross-section to co <<
125 <<
126 <<
127 Example GB06: <<
128 ============= <<
129 <<
130 Illustrates the usage of parallel geometries w <<
131 <<
132 Example GB07: <<
133 ============= <<
134 <<
135 Illustrates the usage of leading particle bias <<
136 88
>> 89 Compiling and running
>> 90 ---------------------
>> 91 To compile this example you need AIDA installed. To link
>> 92 and run it you need a AIDA compliant analysis package.
>> 93 Histograms are saved in HBOOK format.
>> 94 You need to set the following variable in your environment:
>> 95 "G4ANALYSIS_USE"
>> 96 The example stores the plot in the file b02.hbook.
137 97
138 _____________________________________________ 98 ___________________________________________________________________________
139 99
140 100
141 Reverse MonteCarlo Technique exam 101 Reverse MonteCarlo Technique example: ReverseMC01
142 --------------------------------- 102 -------------------------------------------------
143 103
144 Example ReverseMC01 104 Example ReverseMC01
145 =================== 105 ===================
146 106
147 Example illustrating the use of the Reverse Mo 107 Example illustrating the use of the Reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) mode in a Geant4
148 application. See details in ReverseMC01/README 108 application. See details in ReverseMC01/README.
149 109